![should i enable avast online security add-on should i enable avast online security add-on](https://static3.avast.com/10002207/web/i/v2/aim/img/avast-online-security/privacy-advisor.png)
Nothing, and generally you shouldn’t need to unless you’re visiting a particularly old website or using a program that’s based on Java (which will run separately from your browser). Java has never really recovered from this bad publicity, and remains neglected by Oracle. This led to Mozilla blocking Java in Firefox, and for security experts such as Graham Cluley to recommend that users disable the plug-in immediately.
#Should i enable avast online security add on Patch#
A few years ago, there was a significant increase in the number of malicious attacks targeting Java, and Oracle (the company that owns Java) was slow to patch known flaws. Once regarded as a “key building block of the web”, Java has long served its purpose and, like Flash, its security vulnerabilities now make it more of a hindrance than a help. In Firefox, go to Tools, Add-ons, Plugins and select ‘Ask to Activate’ next to Shockwave Flash.
![should i enable avast online security add-on should i enable avast online security add-on](https://helpdeskgeek.com/wp-content/pictures/2020/07/avast-security-extension-overlay.png)
Scroll down to Plug-ins, select ‘ Click to play’ and click Finished. To do this in Chrome, go to Settings, ‘ Show advanced settings’, Privacy and click ‘ Content settings’. Instead, you should disable the plug-in and choose whether or not to run it when you encounter Flash. Sadly, as some sites still use Flash, including BBC News, if you remove it, you won’t be able to see certain content. You can test Shumway by installing the add-on and trying the demos at /shumway, which include rendering this fearsome tiger. YouTube recently announced that it was ditching Flash for HTML5, and Mozilla is developing a tool called Shumway that converts Flash content into HTML5. So a game might use UDP 5678 for GameState transfer, and might use TCP 5679 for chat - in this case, you'd add these two (and only these two) exceptions in the firewall.Add to this the well-known performance problems – such as Flash crashing and taking your browser with it – and it’s clear why you should opt out of this buggy old plug-in.Ī lot of web content that once used Flash, such as videos, games and animations, is now rendered in HTML5, which is built into all modern browsers. In-Game-Chat is a great candidate for TCP, since performance is not critical, and order of data is important. GameState is a great candidate for a UDP type of transmission, because speed is more important than getting every packet in order, loss of packets is made up for by client-side prediction. The reason some games use both UDP and TCP is because in-game, there are a variety of services being communicated with from client -> server and also server -> client. Think of an IP address like a physical address, and think of the port as the apartment number - take a web server for example, it has an IP address and listens on TCP port 80, even though the website can be viewed by hundreds or thousands of clients they all send their requests to "port 80" and the operating system sends those to the web server which is listening on that port. For both protocols, a port must be "allowed" and an application must be listening on that port. You mention TCP and UDP "Connections" - TCP has connections and has handshakes built into the protocol, UDP does not. In his post makes several great points, I'd like to add a bit more background for you. In terms of configuring your firewall for maximum security: block EVERYTHING except that which you absolutely cannot live without. They're just packets, they don't somehow "collide" if they are of the same port. The firewall can read it and drop the packet if it's out of your specified ranges, and the operating system obviously obeys it and hands the packet to the application listening for that port, but the network system doesn't care if two or more people send and receive packets over the same port. On a low level, a "port" is just a number tacked onto a packet. There can of course be several ports open, but the main point is that each port can handle more than one simultaneous connection to or from it, so you need only open ports on your firewall corresponding to any ports that the game server listens on this may be one or a few, but it should not be thousands of ports. Each client connects to one public port, whichever that port may be, and all communication comes in through that single listening port, even if there are thousands of players. From the way your question is worded, I get the impression that you think there needs to be one incoming port per player connection this is not at all the case.